FreeInformation, not adviceWorks on any vendor's outputNeutral referee
Independently verify any legal AI’s output.
Paste the brief, memo, or answer your AI tool produced — from any vendor. TrustAI didn’t write it and has no stake in the tool that did. It independently checks what is objectively verifiable — whether each case citation exists — and flags, for your review, the structural red-flags behind AI-fabrication risk: a quotation tied to no citation, and a legal proposition stated without one. It never tells you the answer is right or wrong. That judgment is your attorney’s.
The AI output
Independent review
Your independent review will appear here: each citation’s verdict with its proof of work, and each structural flag with the exact passage it points to.
What it checks — and what it never claims
TrustAI surfaces information; your licensed attorney judges fit and correctness. It reports three things, and nothing more:
- Citation existence — each case citation is VERIFIED, NOT FOUND (in a well-covered reporter — verify before filing), or UNVERIFIABLE (outside confident coverage or unreachable — check manually; never an accusation that a real case is fake).
- Orphan quotations — a quotation tied to no citation is flagged so you can locate and confirm its source. It surfaces the missing link; confirming the quoted language against the source opinion remains your review.
- Uncited propositions — a legal proposition stated as established with no citation in its sentence is flagged for your review. This is a structural observation, never a determination that the statement is wrong.
It does not opine on whether an authority supports your argument, whether the analysis is correct, or what to do next. A deeper independent multi-model cross-check is available to firms on request.
Sources & authority
| What this relies on | Authority |
|---|---|
| The fabricated-citation risk this addresses | Mata v. Avianca, Inc., 678 F. Supp. 3d 443 (S.D.N.Y. 2023) |
| A lawyer’s duty to verify AI output | ABA Formal Opinion 512 (2024); D.C. Bar Opinion 388 (2024) |
| The citation database | CourtListener / Free Law Project, Citation Lookup API |