← TrustAI

FreeInformation, not adviceWorks on any vendor's outputNeutral referee

Independently verify any legal AI’s output.

Paste the brief, memo, or answer your AI tool produced — from any vendor. TrustAI didn’t write it and has no stake in the tool that did. It independently checks what is objectively verifiable — whether each case citation exists — and flags, for your review, the structural red-flags behind AI-fabrication risk: a quotation tied to no citation, and a legal proposition stated without one. It never tells you the answer is right or wrong. That judgment is your attorney’s.

Why a neutral referee. A tool can’t credibly grade its own homework. Independent research found leading legal-AI tools hallucinate citations at material rates, and attorneys have been sanctioned for filing AI-fabricated cases — the court in Mata v. Avianca, 678 F. Supp. 3d 443 (S.D.N.Y. 2023) imposed a $5,000 sanction over six fabricated opinions. This is an independent check on whatever your AI hands you, before you rely on it.

The AI output

Independent review

Your independent review will appear here: each citation’s verdict with its proof of work, and each structural flag with the exact passage it points to.

What it checks — and what it never claims

TrustAI surfaces information; your licensed attorney judges fit and correctness. It reports three things, and nothing more:

It does not opine on whether an authority supports your argument, whether the analysis is correct, or what to do next. A deeper independent multi-model cross-check is available to firms on request.

Sources & authority

What this relies onAuthority
The fabricated-citation risk this addressesMata v. Avianca, Inc., 678 F. Supp. 3d 443 (S.D.N.Y. 2023)
A lawyer’s duty to verify AI outputABA Formal Opinion 512 (2024); D.C. Bar Opinion 388 (2024)
The citation databaseCourtListener / Free Law Project, Citation Lookup API
TrustAI is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. This tool independently verifies whether citations exist and flags structural gaps — a quotation tied to no citation, and a proposition stated without one — for your review; it does not tell you whether an authority supports your argument, whether the output is correct, or what action to take. Those judgments belong to a licensed attorney. What TrustAI does, and never does →